Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SR-12186] Write integration tests for PIFBuilder and the XCBuild backend #4602

Closed
hartbit opened this issue Feb 12, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

[SR-12186] Write integration tests for PIFBuilder and the XCBuild backend #4602

hartbit opened this issue Feb 12, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@hartbit
Labels
task

Comments

@hartbit
Copy link
Collaborator

hartbit commented Feb 12, 2020

Previous ID SR-12186
Radar rdar://problem/59496043
Original Reporter @hartbit
Type Task
Status Resolved
Resolution Done
Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s Package Manager
Labels Task
Assignee @hartbit
Priority Medium

md5: 411c4aab6d674155d4de974df356de9c

blocks:

  • SR-12187 Implement the XCBuild backend for the swift package commands
  • SR-12188 Implement the XCBuild backend for the swift test commands

is blocked by:

  • SR-12184 Handle system library targets in PIFBuilder
  • SR-12185 Setup an XCBuild backend for swift-build

Issue Description:

Once the PIFBuilder is complete (SR-12184) and there is a way to compile projects with the XCBuild backend (SR-12185), we need integration tests that make sure different project types build with xcbuild.
@beccadax
Copy link
Contributor

@swift-ci create

@hartbit
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hartbit commented Feb 18, 2020

Done as part of #2585

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
@shahmishal shahmishal transferred this issue from apple/swift May 4, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hartbit hartbit

Labels
task
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hartbit @beccadax