We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
md5: 3f2004d0c4b203eaf11909ccaf1a3b36
Issue Description:
If you run
swift demangle --expand sSvSgA3ASbIetCyyd_SgSbIetCyyyd_SgD
The output shows that the correct type is
Optional<@convention(c) (Optional<UnsafeMutableRawPointer>, Optional<UnsafeMutableRawPointer>, Optional<@convention(c) (Optional<UnsafeMutableRawPointer>, Optional<UnsafeMutableRawPointer>) -> Bool>) -> Bool>
but it is printed as
@escaping @convention(thin) @convention(c) (@unowned Swift.UnsafeMutableRawPointer?, @unowned Swift.UnsafeMutableRawPointer?, @unowned @escaping @convention(thin) @convention(c) (@unowned Swift.UnsafeMutableRawPointer?, @unowned Swift.UnsafeMutableRawPointer?) -> (@unowned Swift.Bool)?) -> (@unowned Swift.Bool)?
This has the wrong precedence. ? binds more tightly than ->.
?
->
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@swift-ci create
Sorry, something went wrong.
This is fixed in #37787
(Cherry picked to release/5.5 in #37814
al45tair
No branches or pull requests
Additional Detail from JIRA
md5: 3f2004d0c4b203eaf11909ccaf1a3b36
Issue Description:
If you run
The output shows that the correct type is
but it is printed as
This has the wrong precedence.
?
binds more tightly than->
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: