[SR-14834] Ideas for switch statements of struct/class with static member initializers #59604

swift-ci · 2021-06-27T00:29:32Z


Previous ID	SR-14834
Radar	None
Original Reporter	huntercmeyer (JIRA User)
Type	New Feature

Additional Detail from JIRA


Votes	0
Component/s	SwiftSyntax
Labels	New Feature
Assignee	None
Priority	Medium

md5: 976bf074a3f76098f22719cc2c027066

Issue Description:

This is my first post, so please let me know if I have any mistakes in the filing process 🙂.

I'd like to propose an idea for Swift. Essentially, my idea would pertain to the scenario when you have a struct/class when you have static members used for initialization. Imagine the following example:

struct Section {

    public private(set) base: Int

    static var main: Section {
        Section(base: 0)
    }

    static var secondary: Section {
        Section(base: 1)
    }
}

let section = Section.main

switch section {
    case .main:
        print("main")
    case .secondary:
        print("secondary")
    default:
        print("This should never happen")
}

When switching through an instance of Section, you must define a default case, even though the default case should never have to be called. One possibility would be the introduction of 'case' members that would replace the static member initializers. Imagine:

@exhaustible
struct Section {

    public private(set) let base: Int
    public private(set) let description: String? = nil

    case var main: Section {
        Section(base: 0)
    }

    case var secondary: Section {
        Section(base: 1)
    }

    case func tertiary(description: String) {
        Section(base: 2, description: description)
    }
}

let section = Section.main

switch section {
    case .main:
        print("main")
    case .secondary:
        print("secondary")
    case .tertiary(let description):
        print("tertiary: \(description)")
}

This implementation would (somehow) allow for the compiler to recognize that these methods should be used for switch statements and remove the need for default cases if the type uses a hypothetical `exhaustible` attribute.

An alternative idea would be to have an `Exhaustible` protocol:

protocol Exhaustible {
    static var cases: [Self]
}

struct Section: Exhaustible {
    public private(set) base: Int

    static var main: Section {
        Section(base: 0)
    }

    static var secondary: Section {
        Section(base: 1)
    }

    static var cases: [Section] {
        [.main, .secondary]
    }
}

let section = Section.main

switch section {
    case .main:
        print("main")
    case .secondary:
        print("secondary")
}

Then perhaps the compiler could (somehow) know that a default case is not needed. I do not know how this could look/work with static functions (such as the tertiary case).

Maybe this isn't a good idea or has been suggested before, but I couldn't find anything online. If anyone has feedback, I'd love to hear it! 🙂.

swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022

shahmishal transferred this issue from apple/swift May 9, 2022

ahoppen removed the new feature label Aug 10, 2022

ahoppen transferred this issue from apple/swift-syntax Aug 10, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[SR-14834] Ideas for switch statements of struct/class with static member initializers #59604

[SR-14834] Ideas for switch statements of struct/class with static member initializers #59604

swift-ci commented Jun 27, 2021

[SR-14834] Ideas for switch statements of struct/class with static member initializers #59604

[SR-14834] Ideas for switch statements of struct/class with static member initializers #59604

Comments

swift-ci commented Jun 27, 2021