Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SR-15750] [Swift-DocC] docc archive transform-for-static-hosting should add support for experimental custom header/footer feature #191

Open
ethan-kusters opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement Improvements or enhancements to existing functionality

Comments

@ethan-kusters
Copy link
Contributor

Previous ID SR-15750
Radar rdar://problem/87740373
Original Reporter @ethan-kusters
Type Improvement
Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s Swift-DocC
Labels Improvement
Assignee None
Priority Medium

md5: 717260373b6916638ec4326a5b4138a8

cloned from:

  • SR-15576 [Swift-DocC] Transform-for-static-hosting does not DocC's experimental custom header/footer feature

relates to:

  • SR-15576 [Swift-DocC] Transform-for-static-hosting does not DocC's experimental custom header/footer feature

Issue Description:

Currently the `docc archive transform-for-static-hosting` action does not respect the experimental header/footer that can be provided in a DocC Catalog.

Note that this bug is specifically tracking support for transforming a pre-built archive that made use of the experimental header/footer feature. Support for picking up an experiemental header/footer as part of the initial conversion is tracked with SR-15576.

The implementation of this would add a new --experimental-enable-custom-templates flag to docc archive transform-for-static-hosting.

@ethan-kusters
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci create

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
@shahmishal shahmishal transferred this issue from apple/swift May 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvements or enhancements to existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant