Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SR-2451] Wording for labels in function types suggests that specific label cannot be used #45056

Closed
jckarter opened this issue Aug 22, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself diagnostics QoI Bug: Diagnostics Quality of Implementation good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@jckarter
Copy link
Member

Previous ID SR-2451
Radar None
Original Reporter @jckarter
Type Bug
Status Closed
Resolution Done
Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s Compiler
Labels Bug, DiagnosticsQoI, StarterBug
Assignee nathanhosselton (JIRA)
Priority Medium

md5: 5eb78dd49072e57c6dabda721d4afa68

Issue Description:

https://twitter.com/griotspeak/status/767003813978845185

The wording Function types cannot have argument label 'result' suggests that something is specifically wrong with the name result rather than the general issue that significant labels in function types are not currently supported.

@swift-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

Comment by Nathan Hosselton (JIRA)

Submitted PR: #4575

@swift-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

swift-ci commented Sep 2, 2016

Comment by Nathan Hosselton (JIRA)

Closed by merged PR: #4575

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself diagnostics QoI Bug: Diagnostics Quality of Implementation good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants