Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SR-3724] Evaluate a fully declaration-order-agnostic layout algorithm for structs #46309

Closed
ematejska mannequin opened this issue Jan 25, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

[SR-3724] Evaluate a fully declaration-order-agnostic layout algorithm for structs #46309

ematejska mannequin opened this issue Jan 25, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
affects ABI Flag: Affects ABI

Comments

@ematejska
Copy link
Mannequin

ematejska mannequin commented Jan 25, 2017

Previous ID SR-3724
Radar rdar://problem/31411204
Original Reporter @ematejska
Type Sub-task
Status Resolved
Resolution Duplicate
Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s
Labels Sub-task, AffectsABI
Assignee None
Priority Medium

md5: 16998bd76284442eaff4d9e118e167dd

Parent-Task:

  • SR-7809 Define layout algorithm for structs

duplicates:

  • SR-3723 Determine if the layout algorithm for structs should layout fields in a different order than declared

Issue Description:

Evaluate a fully declaration-order-agnostic layout algorithm for structs to allow data members to be reordered in source without breaking binary compatibility. This is ahead of ABI Stability.

@bob-wilson
Copy link

@swift-ci create

@bob-wilson
Copy link

We also have SR-3723 "Determine if the layout algorithm for structs should layout fields in a different order than declared". These are basically the same thing – either we match the declaration order or we don't – so let's just track this in SR-3723.

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
affects ABI Flag: Affects ABI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant