Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SR-8917] FileHandle warning: 'let' properties are implicitly 'final'; use 'public' instead of 'open' #3623

Closed
kevints mannequin opened this issue Oct 5, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

[SR-8917] FileHandle warning: 'let' properties are implicitly 'final'; use 'public' instead of 'open' #3623

kevints mannequin opened this issue Oct 5, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@spevans
Labels
bug Foundation

Comments

@kevints
Copy link
Mannequin

kevints mannequin commented Oct 5, 2018

Previous ID SR-8917
Radar None
Original Reporter @kevints
Type Bug
Status Resolved
Resolution Done
Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s Foundation
Labels Bug
Assignee @spevans
Priority Medium

md5: 5eff2be89051ae4a6c137d048ebe99f6

relates to:

  • SR-7608 Pipe() crashes when the underlying system call fails.

Issue Description:

Foundation/FileHandle.swift:369:14: warning: 'let' properties are implicitly 'final'; use 'public' instead of 'open'
    open let fileHandleForReading: FileHandle
    ~~~~     ^
    public
Foundation/FileHandle.swift:370:14: warning: 'let' properties are implicitly 'final'; use 'public' instead of 'open'
    open let fileHandleForWriting: FileHandle
    ~~~~     ^
    public
@spevans
Copy link
Collaborator

spevans commented Jan 16, 2020

This was fixed in #1697 as a fix for SR-7608

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
@shahmishal shahmishal transferred this issue from apple/swift May 5, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@spevans spevans

Labels
bug Foundation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@spevans