Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SR-11909] callAsFunction doesn't respect defaults when used with a ".member" expr #54327

Closed
hamishknight opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

[SR-11909] callAsFunction doesn't respect defaults when used with a ".member" expr #54327

hamishknight opened this issue Dec 6, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
@hamishknight
Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself type checker Area → compiler: Semantic analysis

Comments

@hamishknight
Copy link
Collaborator

Previous ID SR-11909
Radar None
Original Reporter @hamishknight
Type Bug
Status Closed
Resolution Done
Environment

Swift version 5.1.2-dev (Swift cafa338)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.0.0

Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s Compiler
Labels Bug, TypeChecker
Assignee @hamishknight
Priority Medium

md5: e599bd00f00f89f748a85156b601e082

Issue Description:

The following doesn't compile:

struct S {
  static let s = S()
  func callAsFunction(x: Int = 0) -> S { S() }
}

let x: S = .s() // error: missing argument for parameter 'x' in call

But it arguably should.
@hamishknight
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fixed by #28604

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hamishknight hamishknight

Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself type checker Area → compiler: Semantic analysis
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hamishknight