Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SR-5240] Creating a reference to a protocol-based function crashes the compiler #47815

Closed
swift-ci opened this issue Jun 16, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself crash Bug: A crash, i.e., an abnormal termination of software

Comments

@swift-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

Previous ID SR-5240
Radar None
Original Reporter jlew (JIRA User)
Type Bug
Status Closed
Resolution Duplicate
Environment

Xcode 8, 9-beta. Swift 3, 3.1, 4.0

Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s Compiler
Labels Bug, CompilerCrash
Assignee None
Priority Medium

md5: 2fc81e65316aa508685c9fd598ee2c2e

duplicates:

  • SR-75 Referencing a protocol function crashes the compiler

Issue Description:

```
protocol Test {
func f()
}
let x = Test.f
```

This crashes the compiler in all versions of swift from 4 back to at least 3.0. I would expect this to capture a function type `(Test) -> (Void) -> Void`, which I could then call with an instance of a concrete type that conforms to `Test`.

@belkadan
Copy link
Contributor

@slavapestov, do we have a dup for this?

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
@AnthonyLatsis AnthonyLatsis added the crash Bug: A crash, i.e., an abnormal termination of software label Dec 12, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself crash Bug: A crash, i.e., an abnormal termination of software
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants