Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SR-6409] SIGUNUSED define removed in glibc 2.26 #790

Closed
swift-ci opened this issue Nov 16, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

[SR-6409] SIGUNUSED define removed in glibc 2.26 #790

swift-ci opened this issue Nov 16, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
bug llbuild

Comments

@swift-ci
Copy link

Previous ID SR-6409
Radar None
Original Reporter tachoknight (JIRA User)
Type Bug
Status Closed
Resolution Done
Environment

GNU/Linux x64 Fedora 27.

Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s llbuild
Labels Bug
Assignee tachoknight (JIRA)
Priority Medium

md5: 23fb87884e1d6e41de19f2603ea23ebd

Issue Description:

The SIGUNUSED define (31) has been removed as part of glibc 2.26, which is used in Fedora 27 and Ubuntu 17.10.

The workaround I have used for compiling under Fedora 27 is to use sed to replace SIGUNUSED with SIGSYS, which is defined with the same value. This may be different on other architectures; I have checked Debian on a Raspberry Pi and SIGSYS and SIGUNUSED are defined the same.
@belkadan
Copy link

Hey, @ddunbar, an llbuild bug!

@ddunbar
Copy link
Member

ddunbar commented Nov 17, 2017

#199

@ddunbar
Copy link
Member

ddunbar commented Nov 18, 2017

Fixed here:

303a89b

Thanks for the report!

@swift-ci
Copy link
Author

Comment by Ron Olson (JIRA)

Thanks for the quick fix!

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
@shahmishal shahmishal transferred this issue from apple/swift May 5, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug llbuild
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ddunbar @belkadan @swift-ci