Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SR-7141] Implement proof-of-concept for move-only types to make sure the standard library can support move-only data #49689

Open
AnnaZaks mannequin opened this issue Mar 8, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself

Comments

@AnnaZaks
Copy link
Mannequin

AnnaZaks mannequin commented Mar 8, 2018

Previous ID SR-7141
Radar rdar://problem/35376746
Original Reporter @AnnaZaks
Type Bug
Additional Detail from JIRA
Votes 0
Component/s Compiler
Labels Bug
Assignee None
Priority Medium

md5: c92a5cb33599a44ec261acaa8cd8b29b

relates to:

  • SR-4355 Update standard library to use memory ownership features

Issue Description:

Adding the concept of move-only types to Swift is important for performance-critical low-level code. See more details in the Ownership manifesto:

https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/OwnershipManifesto.md

@AnnaZaks
Copy link
Mannequin Author

AnnaZaks mannequin commented May 29, 2018

Move-only types feature is out of scope for Swift 5. Move-only types support could be added later in an ABI-compatible way, although library support is likely to introduce extra complexity. It's likely that when the feature it added, move-only types will be gated on a deployment check.

@swift-ci swift-ci transferred this issue from apple/swift-issues Apr 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug A deviation from expected or documented behavior. Also: expected but undesirable behavior. compiler The Swift compiler in itself
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants