These sound like they're the same as whatever SR-9474 is. Are the appropriate compiler-rt libraries getting built?

Comment by Sarvesh Tamba (JIRA)

@belkadan Do you mean these -

libclang_rt.asan-powerpc64le.a,

libclang_rt.tsan-powerpc64le.a,

libclang_rt.ubsan_minimal-powerpc64le.a,

libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone-powerpc64le.a?

I can see them under "build/buildbot_linux/llvm-linux-powerpc64le/lib/clang/7.0.0/lib/linux". I also tried including these in the failing test, no luck though.

However I cannot see them under "swift/test/Driver/Inputs/fake-resource-dir/lib/swift/clang/lib/linux/libclang_rt.tsan-x86_64.a" as for other platforms like libclang_rt.tsan-x86_64.a

Are we missing anything on PowerPC64LE?

Ah, yeah, it seems reasonable to add them there.

Comment by Sarvesh Tamba (JIRA)

@belkadan the test Driver/fuzzer.swift seems to be supported only for OSX and x86_64. I could find only libclang_rt.fuzzer_osx.a and libclang_rt.fuzzer-x86_64.a

Also the test is unsupported for Windows32

// UNSUPPORTED: win32

Can this be unsupported for PowerPC64LE as well?

That's up to you to decide, or whoever maintains the PowerPC64LE support going forward. It is an optional feature of the compiler, sure.